Refuting Fossil “Evidence” for Evolution: The Data is NOT in the Strata

Refuting Fossil “Evidence” for Evolution: The Data is NOT in the Strata

Acknowledgements Introduction his document discusses the way radiometric dating and stratigraphic principles are used to establish the conventional geological time scale. It is not about the theory behind radiometric dating methods, it is about their application, and it therefore assumes the reader has some familiarity with the technique already refer to “Other Sources” for more information. As an example of how they are used, radiometric dates from geologically simple, fossiliferous Cretaceous rocks in western North America are compared to the geological time scale. To get to that point, there is also a historical discussion and description of non-radiometric dating methods. A common form of criticism is to cite geologically complicated situations where the application of radiometric dating is very challenging. These are often characterised as the norm, rather than the exception. I thought it would be useful to present an example where the geology is simple, and unsurprisingly, the method does work well, to show the quality of data that would have to be invalidated before a major revision of the geologic time scale could be accepted by conventional scientists. Geochronologists do not claim that radiometric dating is foolproof no scientific method is , but it does work reliably for most samples. It is these highly consistent and reliable samples, rather than the tricky ones, that have to be falsified for “young Earth” theories to have any scientific plausibility, not to mention the need to falsify huge amounts of evidence from other techniques.

The way it really is: little-known facts about radiometric dating

Leibnitz reworked Descartes’s cosmogony. Protogea was published much later in An essay toward a Natural History of the Earth. Woodward came down fairly strongly for the view that the flood was an act of God that could not be accounted for by normal physical processes. He also postulated hydrological sorting to account for the ordering of fossils.

Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for The Bible, Rocks and Time: Geological Evidence for the Age of the Earth at Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users.

Thus we do not know the absolute age of any given layer. The civilizations that deposited the trash had a culture and industrial capabilities that evolved through time. The oldest inhabitants used primitive stone tools, later inhabitants used cups made of ceramics, even later inhabitants eventually used tin cans and then changed to Aluminum cans, and then they developed a technology that used computers.

Similar cultures must have existed in both areas and lived at the same time. Thus we can make correlation’s between the layers found at the different sites, by reasoning that layers containing similar discarded items artifacts were deposited during the same time period. Thus, we can recognize a hiatus, or break in the depositional sequence at the UNO site.

The surface marking in the break in deposition would be called an unconformity in geologic terms, and represents time missing from the depositional record. The trash pits contain some clues to absolute age: The Tulane trash pit has an old license plate in the Tin Cans layer.

Geologic time scale

Hadean Eon The name says it all; a hellish period lasting some million years, when the Earth was subject to frequent bombardment by comets, asteroids, and other planetary debris. This era begins when a Mars-sized body struck the original Earth, pulverizing both, and reforming into the current Earth-moon binary. Gradually the molten Earth cools, outgassing of first atmosphere and oceans, bombardment by left-over planetesimal and debris.

The Hadean eon was characterized by extensive volcanism and formation of the first crust. Following a second period of cosmic bombardment , by the end of the Hadean, the Earth had an atmosphere unbreathable to most organisms today , and oceans filled with water. Archean Eon Lasting more than twice as long as the Phanerozoic eon, the Archean was a time when diverse microbial life flourished in the primordial oceans, and the continental shields developed from volcanic activity.

Amino acids and layers strata and the given a geological events, etc. Abstract: the relative dating rock are known as the first traces of reading the late s and using: the rock. For example, it is called strata, strata, or younger strata called stratigraphy.

Thank you for your response. My question to you was: No, of course not. Therefore, when you admit that you could be wrong about everything you claim to know, you have given up appeals to knowledge. And yet, following that admission, you make countless subsequent knowledge claims which cannot be accounted for according to your worldview. You cannot demonstrate from your worldview that certainty is impossible.

How do you justify this claim? Attempting to prove the impossibility of anything leads you down the philosophical path known as an infinite regress which is without a firm conclusion. You could no more prove the impossibility of something than you could prove the extinction of something unless you were everywhere at all times. In order to say that something is impossible, you must first appeal to an absolute standard of what IS possible in order to know that the proposition in question remains outside the realm of possibility.

Therefore, without an absolute standard of possibilities, how do you justify this claim? To say that it is certain that there is no certainty is a self-refutation. Are you certain that there is no certainty?

How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments?

Its History and Development Scottish geologist James Hutton set the stage for the development of the geologic time scale in the late 18th century with the publication of his Theory of the Earth In it, Hutton advanced “uniformitarianism,” a geological doctrine which basically assumes that current geologic processes, occurring at the same rates observed today, in the same manner, account for all of Earth’s geological features, a principle later championed by British geologist Sir Charles Lyell Next, British civil engineer, surveyor and amateur geologist William Smith made the discovery that fossils are found buried in a definite order.

The geologic time scale was developed shortly thereafter.

Introduction. Although (as explained in the parent unit (more inclusive unit) of this topic) there are many possible timescales (which range from the very long (billions of years) to the very short), Geological time, which deals in millions or tens of millions of years, is the main focus here at Palaeos. Therefore this page provides the starting point for an overview of Earth history.

At the time that Darwin’s On the Origin of Species was published, the earth was “scientifically” determined to be million years old. By , it was found to be 1. In , science firmly established that the earth was 3. Finally in , it was discovered that the earth is “really” 4. In these early studies the order of sedimentary rocks and structures were used to date geologic time periods and events in a relative way.

At first, the use of “key” diagnostic fossils was used to compare different areas of the geologic column. Although there were attempts to make relative age estimates, no direct dating method was available until the twentieth century. However, before this time some very popular indirect methods were available. For example, Lord Kelvin had estimated the ages of both the Earth and the Sun based on cooling rates.

Much Evidence Exists for a Worldwide Flood

It is an ancient construction that has baffled researchers ever since its discovery and until today, no one has been able to accurately date the Sphinx, since there are no written records or mentions in the past about it. Now, two Ukrainian researchers have proposed a new provocative theory where the two scientists propose that the Great Sphinx of Egypt is around , years old.

A Revolutionary theory that is backed up by science. The authors of this paper are scientists Manichev Vjacheslav I. According to Manichev and Parkhomenko: Geological approach in connection to other scientific-natural methods permits to answer the question about the relative age of the Sphinx.

Relative dating is used to arrange geological events, and the rocks they leave behind, in a sequence. The method of reading the order is called stratigraphy (layers of rock are called strata). Relative dating does not provide actual numerical dates for the rocks.

Horseshoe Canyon Formations exposed in Horseshoe Canyon near Drumheller , Alberta At a certain locality on the Earth’s surface, the rock column provides a cross section of the natural history in the area during the time covered by the age of the rocks. This is sometimes called the rock history and gives a window into the natural history of the location that spans many geological time units such as ages, epochs, or in some cases even multiple major geologic periods —for the particular geographic region or regions.

The geologic record is in no one place entirely complete [1] for where geologic forces one age provide a low-lying region accumulating deposits much like a layer cake, in the next may have uplifted the region, and the same area is instead one that is weathering and being torn down by chemistry, wind, temperature, and water. This is to say that in a given location, the geologic record can be and is quite often interrupted as the ancient local environment was converted by geological forces into new landforms and features.

However using broadly occurring deposited layers trapped within differently located rock columns, geologists have pieced together a system of units covering most of the geologic time scale using the law of superposition, for where tectonic forces have uplifted one ridge newly subject to erosion and weathering in folding and faulting the strata, they have also created a nearby trough or structural basin region that lies at a relative lower elevation that can accumulate additional deposits.

By comparing overall formations, geologic structures and local strata, calibrated by those layers which are widespread, a nearly complete geologic record has been constructed since the 17th century.

Geological period

Scientific measurements such as radiometric dating use the natural radioactivity of certain elements found in rocks to help determine their age. Scientists also use direct evidence from observations of the rock layers themselves to help determine the relative age of rock layers. Specific rock formations are indicative of a particular type of environment existing when the rock was being formed.

For example, most limestones represent marine environments, whereas, sandstones with ripple marks might indicate a shoreline habitat or a riverbed. The study and comparison of exposed rock layers or strata in various parts of the earth led scientists in the early 19th century to propose that the rock layers could be correlated from place to place. Locally, physical characteristics of rocks can be compared and correlated.

correlative conformity. forced regression. hiatus. sequence. sequence boundary. type 1 sequence boundary. type 2 sequence boundary. A surface of erosion or non-deposition separating younger strata from older rocks, along which there is evidence of subaerial erosional truncation (and, in some areas, correlative submarine erosion) or subaerial exposure, with a significant hiatus indicated.

Correlation issues[ edit ] In a steady effort ongoing since , the International Commission on Stratigraphy has been working to correlate the world’s local stratigraphic record into one uniform planet-wide benchmarked system. American geologists have long considered the Mississippian and Pennsylvanian to be periods in their own right though the ICS now recognises them both as ‘subperiods’ of the Carboniferous Period recognised by European geologists.

Cases like this in China, Russia and even New Zealand with other geological eras has slowed down the uniform organization of the stratigraphic record. Notable changes Changes in recent years have included the abandonment of the former Tertiary Period in favour of the Paleogene and succeeding Neogene periods. The abandonment of the Quaternary period was also considered but it has been retained for continuity reasons.

Even earlier in the history of the science, the Tertiary was considered to be an ‘era’ and its subdivisions Paleocene , Eocene , Oligocene , Miocene and Pliocene were themselves referred to as ‘periods’ but they now enjoy the status of ‘epochs’ within the more recently delineated Paleogene and Neogene periods.

geological

Carbon , Radiometric Dating and Index Fossils Carbon dating is used to determine the age of biological artifacts up to 50, years old. This technique is widely used on recent artifacts, but educators and students alike should note that this technique will not work on older fossils like those of the dinosaurs alleged to be millions of years old. This technique is not restricted to bones; it can also be used on cloth, wood and plant fibers. Carbon dating has been used successfully on the Dead Sea Scrolls, Minoan ruins and tombs of the pharaohs among other things.

Although geologists can and do legitimately quibble over the exact age of a particular fossil or formation (e.g., is it million years old or million?), and genuinely problematic samples do exist, claims that radiometric dating is so unreliable that the calibration of the geological time scale could be modified by several orders of magnitude (x, x, or even 10x) are ridiculous from a scientific standpoint.

The Masore section in Slovenia has been restudied. Abstract Upper Permian and lowermost Triassic strata of the Masore section in western Slovenia have been restudied by means of bio- and lithostratigraphy. This section is mainly characterized by a carbonate succession of the Bellerophon Formation deposited in a shallow marine ramp environment that was located in the western part of the Paleotethys.

The Permian-Triassic boundary PTB transition is marked by laminated microbialites — stromatolites interpreted to reflect a deeper ramp environment. The conodont elements recovered enabled the recognition of the Hindeodus praeparvus Zone of the uppermost Permian Upper Changhsingian in the Bellerophon Formation. Gondolellids are documented in the PTB transitional interval with microbial microfacies, whereas the Isarcicella isarcica Zone Lower Griesbachian, Lower Triassic is recognized in the tectonically separated Werfen Formation just above the microbial microfacies part of the section.

The lowermost part of the microbialites is characterized by Late Permian species of foraminifers indicating that at least this part of the section is still Upper Permian. Previous article in issue.

Scientists: Geological evidence shows the Great Sphinx is 800,000 years old

The assumption that the geologic column is a base from which to calibrate the C dates is not wise. With a half-life of only years, carbon dating has nothing to do with dating the geological ages! Whether by sloppiness or gross ignorance, Dr. Hovind is confusing the carbon “clock” with other radiometric “clocks. Being ancient, the C content has long since decayed away and that makes it useful in “zeroing” laboratory instruments.

It’s just one of the tricks that have been used to make the work a little more precise.

Potassium – Argon (K-Ar) Dating In nature there are three isotopes of potassium: 39K – non-radioactive (stable) 40K – radioactive with a half life of billion years, 40K decays to 40Ar and 40Ca, only the K-Ar branch is used in dating.

Though they may know it as carbon dating or carbon 14 dating, there is an understood notion that when anything old is found, like an ancient artifact, it can be radiocarbon dated to find out exactly how old it is. Yet, as simple and straightforward as this seems, the process of dating objects via radiocarbon is far from simple and straightforward. Here I will present what radiocarbon is, the dating methods, the assumptions that govern them, and the known discrepancies that plague the method.

With a thorough understanding of this dating method, it is my opinion that its ingenious fundamentals can be appreciated, yet greatly overshadowed by its limitations. Radiocarbon Every day cosmic rays bombard our atmosphere. These cosmic rays release free neutrons which zip around our nitrogen rich atmosphere at high velocities. As the Carbon 14 slowly descends into our lower atmosphere it bonds with oxygen becoming the very unpopular CO2 greenhouse gas Bowman, Though the vast majority of CO2 is comprised of the more common and stable isotope of carbon, carbon 12 C12 , a small fraction of CO2 one in million , contains C As is common fact, plants photosynthesize and consume CO2, fixing its carbon.

Since a small fraction of CO2 contains C14, some of carbon fixed within the plant is that of C When an organism dies, it obviously no longer eats, photosynthesizes, etc.

Geologic time scale

Early history[ edit ] In Ancient Greece , Aristotle BCE observed that fossils of seashells in rocks resembled those found on beaches — he inferred that the fossils in rocks were formed by living animals, and he reasoned that the positions of land and sea had changed over long periods of time. Leonardo da Vinci — concurred with Aristotle’s interpretation that fossils represented the remains of ancient life. Steno argued that rock layers or strata were laid down in succession, and that each represents a “slice” of time.

He also formulated the law of superposition, which states that any given stratum is probably older than those above it and younger than those below it. While Steno’s principles were simple, applying them proved challenging.

Many authors choose to present the history of a complex subject by breaking it up into major threads and following the history of each thread separately.

The way it really is: Even the way dates are reported e. However, although we can measure many things about a rock, we cannot directly measure its age. For example, we can measure its mass, its volume, its colour, the minerals in it, their size and the way they are arranged. We can crush the rock and measure its chemical composition and the radioactive elements it contains.

But we do not have an instrument that directly measures age. Before we can calculate the age of a rock from its measured chemical composition, we must assume what radioactive elements were in the rock when it formed. It may be surprising to learn that evolutionary geologists themselves will not accept a radiometric date unless they think it is correct—i.

It is one thing to calculate a date. It is another thing to understand what it means. Field relationships A geologist works out the relative age of a rock by carefully studying where the rock is found in the field. The field relationships, as they are called, are of primary importance and all radiometric dates are evaluated against them. For example, a geologist may examine a cutting where the rocks appear as shown in Figure 1.

Relative Dating – Example 1


Comments are closed.

Hi! Do you need to find a partner for sex? Nothing is more simple! Click here, registration is free!